An example report on a real UK business
ANYJUNK LIMITED is shown so you can see the full output. Run the same report on your own company in under two minutes.
Value my own businessValuation: ANYJUNK LIMITED
Indicative valuation
£24.0m to £32.0m
- Adjusted EBITDA
- £4.0m
- Typical exit EBITDA multiple
- 6x - 8x
FY2025 operating profit of £3,969k plus depreciation £23k and amortisation £150k
Asset-light, tech-enabled waste platform with recurring B2B revenue; comparable to Reconomy platform acquisitions at 6x-8x
Confidence: medium
Company snapshot
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Registered name | ANYJUNK LIMITED |
| Company number | 05166059 |
| Incorporated | 2004 (29 June 2004) |
| Registered office | 9 Felsham Road, London, SW15 1AX |
| Principal owner | Mr Jason Anthony John Mohr (50–75% of shares) |
| Directors | Benjamin Shields Black, James Ernest Gibson, Jason Anthony John Mohr |
| SIC / activity | 38110 – Collection of non-hazardous waste |
| Accounts made up to | 30 September 2025 |
Business description
AnyJunk operates a technology-enabled platform matching on-demand bulky waste collection jobs to a network of over 500 partner vehicles across the UK, earning a margin on each transaction rather than owning fleet. More than 95% of revenue comes from commercial account customers, including housing associations, councils and national retailers, providing high repeat-purchase dynamics. A small secondary revenue stream comes from in-house software development services sold to third parties.
The industry
AnyJunk sits in the UK bulky waste collection market, a sub-segment of the broader non-hazardous waste sector worth an estimated £10–12 billion annually, with bulky and commercial clearance representing roughly £1–1.5 billion. Growth is running at an estimated 3–8% per year, driven by rising e-commerce returns, tenant turnover in rental housing, stricter landfill diversion targets and local authority outsourcing of bulky collection services.
The market is highly fragmented. At the local level it is dominated by small van operators, with only a handful of national or regional platforms. Consolidation is underway: trade buyers and private equity have been acquiring specialist waste businesses to build route density and digital capability. Notable roll-ups include Reconomy, Countrystyle and Powerday, and there is continued appetite for asset-light or tech-enabled operators that can be bolted onto logistics networks.
The outlook for the next three to five years is modestly positive, supported by regulatory tailwinds around landfill taxes and extended producer responsibility. The main structural risk is margin pressure if large waste groups build their own booking platforms, commoditising the brokerage layer. For a seller, this is a good window: acquirers are actively seeking digital capability and national coverage, but timing matters because the platform advantage may narrow as incumbents invest.
Top competitors
- Clearabee – national man-and-van clearance, direct competitor on digital booking and commercial accounts (inferred)
- 1300Rubbish / JustJunk (US-style franchises) – franchise models targeting the same SME and domestic segments (inferred)
- Reconomy – large waste management platform with bulky collection capability through acquisitions (inferred)
- Hippo Waste – skip bag alternative competing for the same household and trade jobs (inferred)
- Local council bulky collections – subsidised municipal services competing on price for domestic customers (inferred)
Reconstructed profit and loss
Reconstructed profit and loss, GBP, figures marked (est.) are derived
- EBITDA
- Additional gross profit
- Cost of sales to total revenue
Basis: Revenue and gross profit for FY2025 and FY2024 are taken directly from the full statutory accounts filed June 2026. FY2023 revenue and gross profit are inferred from the prior-year comparative in the FY2024 accounts. EBITDA is estimated by adding back depreciation (£23k) and amortisation (£150k) to operating profit (£3,969k) for FY2025, giving approximately £4.14m; for FY2024 the same method yields approximately £3.38m. Headcount is not disclosed in the filings.
Reconstructed balance sheet
| Line | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed assets | £4.2m | £4.0m | n/d |
| Stock | £4k | £12k | n/d |
| Debtors | £4.6m | £4.7m | n/d |
| Cash | £2.0m | £1.0m | n/d |
| Creditors due within one year | £3.1m | £3.3m | n/d |
| Creditors due after one year | £611k | £699k | n/d |
| Net current assets | £3.5m | £2.5m | n/d |
| Net assets | £7.0m | £5.7m | n/d |
The business carries modest debt: bank and other borrowings total approximately £700k (£88k short-term, £611k long-term), offset by cash of £2.0m, giving a net cash position of roughly £1.3m. Enterprise value therefore sits close to equity value. Working capital is light relative to revenue, with debtors at around 70 days but creditors similarly extended, implying low normalised working capital needs. The balance sheet includes £2.1m of unlisted investments carried at cost, which a buyer would likely treat as either surplus or would revalue; if these relate to the associate mentioned in the accounts, they may form part of the operating model and require due diligence.
Valuation and workings
Most recent filed accounts: FY2025, made up to 30 September 2025. These are less than 12 months old relative to today (August 2026), so valuation is based on the filed year without roll-forward.
EBITDA basis: Operating profit of £3,969k plus depreciation £23k plus amortisation £150k gives EBITDA of approximately £4.0m for FY2025.
Multiple rationale: UK waste services businesses typically trade at 5.0x to 7.0x EBITDA at the smaller end, with asset-light, tech-enabled platforms attracting a premium. Reconomy's acquisition spree (multiple transactions 2018–2022, multiples reported in the 6x–8x range for platform assets) provides a reference point; Clearabee was acquired in 2021 at a reported enterprise value implying a mid-single-digit EBITDA multiple (source: industry press, no public confirmation of exact figure). Given AnyJunk's recurring commercial revenue base (95%+ B2B accounts), strong EBITDA margin (~17%), double-digit revenue growth (13% YoY) and asset-light model, the applicable range is 6.0x to 8.0x.
Indicative enterprise value: £4.0m × 6.0x = £24m; £4.0m × 8.0x = £32m. Range: £24m to £32m.
What buyers call exceptional
These bars are calibrated for UK SMEs and do not apply to midcap or larger businesses, where the thresholds are very different.
| Metric | Good | Exceptional | This business | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry growth | 5%+ CAGR | 10%+ CAGR | 3–8% (est.) | Below |
| Revenue scale | £10m+ | £20m+ | £23.0m | Exceptional |
| Revenue growth | 8%+ YoY | 15%+ YoY | 13% YoY | Good |
| EBITDA margin | 17.5%+ | 22.5%+ | 17.4% | Below |
| Gross margin | 50%+ | 75%+ | 29% | Below |
| Customer concentration | Top 5 < 15% | Top 5 < 10% | Not disclosed | Unknown |
The metric that most limits the multiple today is gross margin, reflecting the inherent cost-of-goods structure of routing jobs to third-party operators rather than capturing the full service margin in-house.
Preparing for exit
| When | Action | Why a buyer cares | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3 months | Produce a customer concentration schedule showing the top 10 accounts by revenue and tenure | Buyers will price key-account risk; demonstrating spread de-risks the multiple | Multiple ↑ |
| 0–3 months | Document the £2.1m unlisted investment and any associate relationship | Acquirers need to know if this is core, surplus or a liability | Multiple ↑ |
| 3–9 months | Formalise multi-year contracts with the largest commercial accounts, adding auto-renewal clauses | Contracted recurring revenue supports a premium; current disclosure suggests repeat but not locked-in revenue | Multiple ↑ |
| 3–9 months | Review operator agreements for exclusivity, IP ownership of routing algorithms and data rights | Tech value is only protectable if IP sits unambiguously with AnyJunk | Multiple ↑ |
| 3–9 months | Hire or promote a commercial lead who can run day-to-day sales without the founder | Reduces key-person dependency on Jason Mohr, critical for PE and trade buyers alike | Multiple ↑ |
| 9–12+ months | Expand gross margin by introducing ancillary services such as skip hire or recycling credits retained in-house | Gross margin is the main drag on the multiple; even a 2–3 point improvement flows straight to EBITDA | EBITDA ↑ / Multiple ↑ |
| 9–12+ months | Explore licensing or SaaS revenue from the platform technology to third-party waste operators | Software revenue commands higher multiples and diversifies income | Multiple ↑ |
The single highest-return action is securing multi-year contracts with the largest accounts, because it converts implied recurring revenue into provable recurring revenue, directly addressing buyer scepticism on revenue quality.
Choosing your sale route
| Route | Fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Trade sale | Strong fit | Revenue at £23m and EBITDA at £4m sit squarely in the target zone for strategic waste groups seeking digital capability and national coverage; platform model slots into existing logistics. |
| Private equity | Strong fit | Double-digit growth, 17% EBITDA margin and asset-light capex are attractive; PE would back the management team to roll up smaller operators and expand the software layer. |
| Individual operator | Possible | Business is complex with technology and operator network; a well-capitalised individual could run it but would need to retain the existing team, narrowing the pool. |
| Employee Ownership Trust | Unlikely | The valuation would be fair rather than competitive, and the business likely qualifies for better pricing through a trade or PE process given current market appetite. |
Recommended route: A competitive trade or PE process is the strongest path. Both buyer types are actively consolidating the UK waste and logistics-tech sectors. Running a dual-track process, inviting strategic acquirers alongside growth-equity and buy-and-build funds, would maximise competitive tension. For this owner, a trade sale likely offers the highest headline price and a clean exit within twelve months, while a PE deal could preserve the brand and offer an equity roll for a second bite. Confidentiality risk on the trade side is manageable because the most credible acquirers, such as national waste groups and logistics platforms, are not direct local competitors.
What the process looks like
At your size expect a structured, competitive auction run by a larger corporate finance house, with full workstream due diligence and international buyers likely on the list. Allow around nine to fifteen months from starting properly to money in the bank.
| Phase | What happens | Typical duration |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation | Full vendor due diligence across financial, legal, tax and commercial, audited accounts, a management team ready to present, a professionally built data room | 3 to 4 months |
| Marketing | Controlled release of a teaser to a wide domestic and international buyer list, NDAs, information memorandum, process letter setting the timetable | 1 to 2 months |
| Offers and selection | Round one indicative offers, management presentations, site visits, round two binding offers, exclusivity granted late and briefly | 2 to 3 months |
| Due diligence | Financial, legal, tax, commercial, IT, insurance, environmental, ESG and pensions workstreams run simultaneously against a fixed timetable | 2 to 3 months |
| Legals | Share purchase agreement, disclosure, warranty and indemnity insurance, equity rollover and reinvestment documents, management incentive plan | 1 to 2 months |
| Completion and beyond | Signing, any regulatory or antitrust clearance, completion, then a defined transition period | Ongoing |
At this size, process discipline is the value driver. A well run timetable with several credible bidders reaching binding offers on the same day is what produces a premium.
What this is built from
- Companies House filings for 05166059.
- The company's public website (www.anyjunk.co.uk), read for what the business actually does and who it sells to.
- Your own ratings on growth, stability, margin and capex, plus sector exit multiples for comparable UK businesses.
Next step
Exit your business to 1868 Capital
1868 Capital, led by Alec Dent, is actively looking to buy and run one strong UK business for the long term. If the profile fits, we can move quickly.

Why Alec started 1868 Capital
LinkedIn postAlec wrote this on why he is looking to buy and run one UK business for the long term.
Read on LinkedInWho is Alec?
Alec Dent leads 1868 Capital, which powers this Exit Estimator. He is looking to buy and personally run one high-quality UK business for the long term.
Before this he co-founded Weezy, grew it to hundreds of staff, sold it to Getir and ran global strategy there. You would be selling your business to an operator who has built, scaled and sold a company.
Is 1868 Capital the right fit?
I meet almost any owner thinking about exit, but this is the formal mandate:
- ✓Revenue of £5m to £60m, ideally with a recurring component and a stable track record
- ✓EBITDA of £1m to £10m with margins of 15% or more
- ✓Consistent growth of 10%+ a year over multiple years
- ✓A strong team in place, allowing a smooth leadership transition
- ✓England, Wales or Scotland, ideally near a major transport hub
- ✓Service-based model in a fragmented sector, mission critical to commercial clients
Other ways to sell
If the mandate does not fit, you may still have strong options:
Trade sale
A competitor or customer buys you. Often the highest headline price, but your business is absorbed and your legacy fades.
Private equity
Financial buyers back the team, then look to sell again in 3 to 5 years on fairly rigid market terms.
Employee Ownership Trust
Sell to your employees, usually with tax advantages and maximum continuity, though at a measured pace.