An example report on a real UK business

ANYJUNK LIMITED is shown so you can see the full output. Run the same report on your own company in under two minutes.

Value my own business
ANYJUNK LIMITED logo

Valuation: ANYJUNK LIMITED

Indicative valuation

£24.0m to £32.0m

Adjusted EBITDA
£4.0m
Typical exit EBITDA multiple
6x - 8x

FY2025 operating profit of £3,969k plus depreciation £23k and amortisation £150k

Asset-light, tech-enabled waste platform with recurring B2B revenue; comparable to Reconomy platform acquisitions at 6x-8x

Confidence: medium

Section 01

Company snapshot

FieldDetail
Registered nameANYJUNK LIMITED
Company number05166059
Incorporated2004 (29 June 2004)
Registered office9 Felsham Road, London, SW15 1AX
Principal ownerMr Jason Anthony John Mohr (50–75% of shares)
DirectorsBenjamin Shields Black, James Ernest Gibson, Jason Anthony John Mohr
SIC / activity38110 – Collection of non-hazardous waste
Accounts made up to30 September 2025

Section 02

Business description

AnyJunk operates a technology-enabled platform matching on-demand bulky waste collection jobs to a network of over 500 partner vehicles across the UK, earning a margin on each transaction rather than owning fleet. More than 95% of revenue comes from commercial account customers, including housing associations, councils and national retailers, providing high repeat-purchase dynamics. A small secondary revenue stream comes from in-house software development services sold to third parties.


Section 03

The industry

AnyJunk sits in the UK bulky waste collection market, a sub-segment of the broader non-hazardous waste sector worth an estimated £10–12 billion annually, with bulky and commercial clearance representing roughly £1–1.5 billion. Growth is running at an estimated 3–8% per year, driven by rising e-commerce returns, tenant turnover in rental housing, stricter landfill diversion targets and local authority outsourcing of bulky collection services.

The market is highly fragmented. At the local level it is dominated by small van operators, with only a handful of national or regional platforms. Consolidation is underway: trade buyers and private equity have been acquiring specialist waste businesses to build route density and digital capability. Notable roll-ups include Reconomy, Countrystyle and Powerday, and there is continued appetite for asset-light or tech-enabled operators that can be bolted onto logistics networks.

The outlook for the next three to five years is modestly positive, supported by regulatory tailwinds around landfill taxes and extended producer responsibility. The main structural risk is margin pressure if large waste groups build their own booking platforms, commoditising the brokerage layer. For a seller, this is a good window: acquirers are actively seeking digital capability and national coverage, but timing matters because the platform advantage may narrow as incumbents invest.


Section 04

Top competitors

  • Clearabee – national man-and-van clearance, direct competitor on digital booking and commercial accounts (inferred)
  • 1300Rubbish / JustJunk (US-style franchises) – franchise models targeting the same SME and domestic segments (inferred)
  • Reconomy – large waste management platform with bulky collection capability through acquisitions (inferred)
  • Hippo Waste – skip bag alternative competing for the same household and trade jobs (inferred)
  • Local council bulky collections – subsidised municipal services competing on price for domestic customers (inferred)

Section 05

Reconstructed profit and loss

Revenue, gross profit and EBITDA

Reconstructed profit and loss, GBP, figures marked (est.) are derived

  • EBITDA
  • Additional gross profit
  • Cost of sales to total revenue
£18.3m
£3m
£20.4m
£3.3m
£23m
£4m
FY2023 (est.)
GP £5.2m · EBITDA £3m
FY2024 (est.)
GP £5.8m · EBITDA £3.3m
FY2025 (est.)
GP £6.6m · EBITDA £4m

Basis: Revenue and gross profit for FY2025 and FY2024 are taken directly from the full statutory accounts filed June 2026. FY2023 revenue and gross profit are inferred from the prior-year comparative in the FY2024 accounts. EBITDA is estimated by adding back depreciation (£23k) and amortisation (£150k) to operating profit (£3,969k) for FY2025, giving approximately £4.14m; for FY2024 the same method yields approximately £3.38m. Headcount is not disclosed in the filings.


Section 06

Reconstructed balance sheet

LineFY2025FY2024FY2023
Fixed assets£4.2m£4.0mn/d
Stock£4k£12kn/d
Debtors£4.6m£4.7mn/d
Cash£2.0m£1.0mn/d
Creditors due within one year£3.1m£3.3mn/d
Creditors due after one year£611k£699kn/d
Net current assets£3.5m£2.5mn/d
Net assets£7.0m£5.7mn/d

The business carries modest debt: bank and other borrowings total approximately £700k (£88k short-term, £611k long-term), offset by cash of £2.0m, giving a net cash position of roughly £1.3m. Enterprise value therefore sits close to equity value. Working capital is light relative to revenue, with debtors at around 70 days but creditors similarly extended, implying low normalised working capital needs. The balance sheet includes £2.1m of unlisted investments carried at cost, which a buyer would likely treat as either surplus or would revalue; if these relate to the associate mentioned in the accounts, they may form part of the operating model and require due diligence.


Section 07

Valuation and workings

Most recent filed accounts: FY2025, made up to 30 September 2025. These are less than 12 months old relative to today (August 2026), so valuation is based on the filed year without roll-forward.

EBITDA basis: Operating profit of £3,969k plus depreciation £23k plus amortisation £150k gives EBITDA of approximately £4.0m for FY2025.

Multiple rationale: UK waste services businesses typically trade at 5.0x to 7.0x EBITDA at the smaller end, with asset-light, tech-enabled platforms attracting a premium. Reconomy's acquisition spree (multiple transactions 2018–2022, multiples reported in the 6x–8x range for platform assets) provides a reference point; Clearabee was acquired in 2021 at a reported enterprise value implying a mid-single-digit EBITDA multiple (source: industry press, no public confirmation of exact figure). Given AnyJunk's recurring commercial revenue base (95%+ B2B accounts), strong EBITDA margin (~17%), double-digit revenue growth (13% YoY) and asset-light model, the applicable range is 6.0x to 8.0x.

Indicative enterprise value: £4.0m × 6.0x = £24m; £4.0m × 8.0x = £32m. Range: £24m to £32m.


Section 08

What buyers call exceptional

These bars are calibrated for UK SMEs and do not apply to midcap or larger businesses, where the thresholds are very different.

MetricGoodExceptionalThis businessRead
Industry growth5%+ CAGR10%+ CAGR3–8% (est.)Below
Revenue scale£10m+£20m+£23.0mExceptional
Revenue growth8%+ YoY15%+ YoY13% YoYGood
EBITDA margin17.5%+22.5%+17.4%Below
Gross margin50%+75%+29%Below
Customer concentrationTop 5 < 15%Top 5 < 10%Not disclosedUnknown

The metric that most limits the multiple today is gross margin, reflecting the inherent cost-of-goods structure of routing jobs to third-party operators rather than capturing the full service margin in-house.


Section 09

Preparing for exit

WhenActionWhy a buyer caresEffect
0–3 monthsProduce a customer concentration schedule showing the top 10 accounts by revenue and tenureBuyers will price key-account risk; demonstrating spread de-risks the multipleMultiple ↑
0–3 monthsDocument the £2.1m unlisted investment and any associate relationshipAcquirers need to know if this is core, surplus or a liabilityMultiple ↑
3–9 monthsFormalise multi-year contracts with the largest commercial accounts, adding auto-renewal clausesContracted recurring revenue supports a premium; current disclosure suggests repeat but not locked-in revenueMultiple ↑
3–9 monthsReview operator agreements for exclusivity, IP ownership of routing algorithms and data rightsTech value is only protectable if IP sits unambiguously with AnyJunkMultiple ↑
3–9 monthsHire or promote a commercial lead who can run day-to-day sales without the founderReduces key-person dependency on Jason Mohr, critical for PE and trade buyers alikeMultiple ↑
9–12+ monthsExpand gross margin by introducing ancillary services such as skip hire or recycling credits retained in-houseGross margin is the main drag on the multiple; even a 2–3 point improvement flows straight to EBITDAEBITDA ↑ / Multiple ↑
9–12+ monthsExplore licensing or SaaS revenue from the platform technology to third-party waste operatorsSoftware revenue commands higher multiples and diversifies incomeMultiple ↑

The single highest-return action is securing multi-year contracts with the largest accounts, because it converts implied recurring revenue into provable recurring revenue, directly addressing buyer scepticism on revenue quality.


Section 10

Choosing your sale route

RouteFitWhy
Trade saleStrong fitRevenue at £23m and EBITDA at £4m sit squarely in the target zone for strategic waste groups seeking digital capability and national coverage; platform model slots into existing logistics.
Private equityStrong fitDouble-digit growth, 17% EBITDA margin and asset-light capex are attractive; PE would back the management team to roll up smaller operators and expand the software layer.
Individual operatorPossibleBusiness is complex with technology and operator network; a well-capitalised individual could run it but would need to retain the existing team, narrowing the pool.
Employee Ownership TrustUnlikelyThe valuation would be fair rather than competitive, and the business likely qualifies for better pricing through a trade or PE process given current market appetite.

Recommended route: A competitive trade or PE process is the strongest path. Both buyer types are actively consolidating the UK waste and logistics-tech sectors. Running a dual-track process, inviting strategic acquirers alongside growth-equity and buy-and-build funds, would maximise competitive tension. For this owner, a trade sale likely offers the highest headline price and a clean exit within twelve months, while a PE deal could preserve the brand and offer an equity roll for a second bite. Confidentiality risk on the trade side is manageable because the most credible acquirers, such as national waste groups and logistics platforms, are not direct local competitors.


Section 11

What the process looks like

At your size expect a structured, competitive auction run by a larger corporate finance house, with full workstream due diligence and international buyers likely on the list. Allow around nine to fifteen months from starting properly to money in the bank.

PhaseWhat happensTypical duration
PreparationFull vendor due diligence across financial, legal, tax and commercial, audited accounts, a management team ready to present, a professionally built data room3 to 4 months
MarketingControlled release of a teaser to a wide domestic and international buyer list, NDAs, information memorandum, process letter setting the timetable1 to 2 months
Offers and selectionRound one indicative offers, management presentations, site visits, round two binding offers, exclusivity granted late and briefly2 to 3 months
Due diligenceFinancial, legal, tax, commercial, IT, insurance, environmental, ESG and pensions workstreams run simultaneously against a fixed timetable2 to 3 months
LegalsShare purchase agreement, disclosure, warranty and indemnity insurance, equity rollover and reinvestment documents, management incentive plan1 to 2 months
Completion and beyondSigning, any regulatory or antitrust clearance, completion, then a defined transition periodOngoing

At this size, process discipline is the value driver. A well run timetable with several credible bidders reaching binding offers on the same day is what produces a premium.

What this is built from

  • Companies House filings for 05166059.
  • The company's public website (www.anyjunk.co.uk), read for what the business actually does and who it sells to.
  • Your own ratings on growth, stability, margin and capex, plus sector exit multiples for comparable UK businesses.

Want this as a PDF?

Provide your email to get this report sent as a PDF

It should arrive immediately. Check your spam if not.

Next step

Exit your business to 1868 Capital

1868 Capital, led by Alec Dent, is actively looking to buy and run one strong UK business for the long term. If the profile fits, we can move quickly.

LinkedIn post by Alec Dent

Why Alec started 1868 Capital

LinkedIn post

Alec wrote this on why he is looking to buy and run one UK business for the long term.

Read on LinkedIn

Who is Alec?

Alec Dent leads 1868 Capital, which powers this Exit Estimator. He is looking to buy and personally run one high-quality UK business for the long term.

Before this he co-founded Weezy, grew it to hundreds of staff, sold it to Getir and ran global strategy there. You would be selling your business to an operator who has built, scaled and sold a company.

Is 1868 Capital the right fit?

I meet almost any owner thinking about exit, but this is the formal mandate:

  • ✓Revenue of £5m to £60m, ideally with a recurring component and a stable track record
  • ✓EBITDA of £1m to £10m with margins of 15% or more
  • ✓Consistent growth of 10%+ a year over multiple years
  • ✓A strong team in place, allowing a smooth leadership transition
  • ✓England, Wales or Scotland, ideally near a major transport hub
  • ✓Service-based model in a fragmented sector, mission critical to commercial clients

Other ways to sell

If the mandate does not fit, you may still have strong options:

Trade sale

A competitor or customer buys you. Often the highest headline price, but your business is absorbed and your legacy fades.

Private equity

Financial buyers back the team, then look to sell again in 3 to 5 years on fairly rigid market terms.

Employee Ownership Trust

Sell to your employees, usually with tax advantages and maximum continuity, though at a measured pace.

Value my business