An example report on a real UK business
CHECKFIRE LTD is shown so you can see the full output. Run the same report on your own company in under two minutes.
Value my own businessValuation: CHECKFIRE LTD
Indicative valuation
£18.0m to £23.4m
- Adjusted EBITDA
- £3.6m
- Typical exit EBITDA multiple
- 5x - 6.5x
FY2025 estimate rolled forward from FY2024 operating profit plus add-back for D&A, applying 15% revenue growth and 8% EBITDA margin given margin compression trend
UK fire safety distribution deals typically close at 5x-7x; Marlowe platform acquisitions at 5x-6x provide precedent; own-brand manufacturing and growth justify upper-mid range
Confidence: medium
Company snapshot
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Registered name | Checkfire Ltd |
| Company number | 07990436 |
| Incorporated | 2012 (14 March 2012) |
| Registered office | 15 Pantglas Industrial Estate, Bedwas, Caerphilly, CF83 8DR, Wales |
| Principal owner | Multishield Group Limited (75–100% control) |
| Directors | Anthony Robins, Cameron Robins, Daniel Peter Robins |
| SIC / activity | 32990 (Other manufacturing n.e.c.) |
| Accounts made up to | 31 December 2024 |
Business description
Checkfire is a trade-only wholesale distributor and manufacturer of fire safety equipment, principally fire extinguishers under its Commander, CommanderEDGE and Contempo brands, plus fire door and fire-stopping products through its FireSealsDirect e-commerce division. Revenue is overwhelmingly product-based, split between repeat consumables (servicing parts, signage, seals) and capital items (extinguishers, cabinets, storage), with no significant recurring maintenance contracts disclosed. The customer base appears to be UK fire trade installers and facilities management companies, served through next-day distribution from its South Wales headquarters and a northern depot.
The industry
Checkfire operates in the UK fire safety equipment distribution and manufacturing market, which is estimated at £500m–600m annually and growing at roughly 5–8% per year, driven by tightening building safety regulation following Grenfell, the Fire Safety Act 2021, and emerging lithium-ion battery fire risks from e-bikes and EVs.
Demand is structurally supported: building owners face stricter inspection regimes, social landlords must demonstrate compliance, and the retrofit cycle on older stock is accelerating. The market is fragmented, with a handful of national distributors (Chubb, Safelincs, Thomas Glover) alongside hundreds of regional servicing firms. Consolidation is underway: trade acquirers and private equity platforms are rolling up smaller servicing and distribution businesses to capture route density and cross-sell recurring services.
Over the next three to five years, expect continued mid-single-digit growth underpinned by regulation and ESG pressure, offset by possible margin compression as larger groups use scale on procurement. The main structural risk is PFAS regulation tightening faster than expected, forcing product reformulation costs across the industry.
For a seller in this market today, acquirer appetite is healthy and the window remains open while compliance-driven demand persists, though competition for assets is pushing multiples toward the top of the historic range.
Top competitors
- Safelincs – online fire safety retailer with overlapping product range (inferred)
- Thomas Glover – UK fire extinguisher manufacturer, similar Commander positioning (inferred)
- Chubb Fire & Security – part of Carrier, large-scale trade and end-user supplier (inferred)
- Jewel Saffire – Midlands-based extinguisher distributor (inferred)
- Fireblitz – lower-cost extinguisher brand competing at value end (inferred)
Reconstructed profit and loss
Reconstructed profit and loss, GBP, figures marked (est.) are derived
- EBITDA
- Additional gross profit
- Cost of sales to total revenue
Basis: Revenue and gross profit for FY2024 and FY2023 are taken directly from the full audited accounts. FY2022 revenue is estimated by applying the 23.5% growth rate disclosed for FY2023 in reverse. EBITDA is estimated by adding back depreciation and amortisation (c.£360k implied from fixed asset movements and amortisation policy) to operating profit. FY2025 revenue is rolled forward at 15%, the midpoint of the disclosed 18% (FY2024) and our 8–20% growth assumption; gross margin held at 25.5% and EBITDA margin at 8% reflecting the FY2024 margin compression. Headcount for FY2025 is extrapolated from the 32% increase FY2023–24.
Reconstructed balance sheet
| Line | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed assets | £2.3m | £0.8m | n/d |
| Stock | £5.0m | £4.6m | n/d |
| Debtors | £6.5m | £5.8m | n/d |
| Cash | £1.4m | £1.5m | n/d |
| Creditors due within one year | £6.0m | £5.6m | n/d |
| Creditors due after one year | £0.8m | £1.1k | n/d |
| Net current assets | £6.9m | £6.3m | n/d |
| Net assets | £7.9m | £6.5m | n/d |
Buyer notes: The balance sheet is relatively clean. Cash of £1.4m is offset by a small overdraft (£82k) and longer-term debt of £0.8m (largely hire purchase and bank loans), implying net debt of c.£0.6m at year-end 2024. The equity-to-EV bridge is therefore modest. Working capital is heavy: stock and debtors together run at c.30% of revenue, typical for distribution businesses but higher than asset-light peers. No property is held in the company; premises appear leased. A buyer would treat the £0.8m HP and loan balances as debt-like. No pension deficit or director loan is disclosed. The new holding company structure (Multishield Group Limited) created in March 2026 may mean completion occurs at Multishield level; advisers should clarify the share capital layers.
Valuation and workings
Most recent filed accounts: FY2024, made up to 31 December 2024. That is roughly 19 months old relative to today (August 2026), so the filed EBITDA is stale. Using the disclosed 18% revenue growth for FY2024 and our assumption of 8–20% growth, I roll forward to FY2025 revenue of £45m, gross margin of 25.5%, and EBITDA of £3.6m at an 8% margin (reflecting the compression seen in FY2024).
Sector multiples: UK mid-market fire safety distribution businesses typically trade at 5x–7x EBITDA, with higher multiples for manufacturing content, own-brand IP and recurring revenue. A relevant precedent is the Marlowe Fire & Security platform, which completed multiple acquisitions between 2018 and 2023 at 5x–6x EBITDA for regional servicing firms (source: Marlowe plc investor presentations, various). Checkfire's manufacturing element and strong brand portfolio justify a multiple toward the upper end of that range.
Operating-scale adjustments: On our assumption of 8–20% industry and business growth, moderate revenue quality (project-weighted but repeat trade customers), a compressed EBITDA margin of 5–10%, and moderate capex intensity, the multiple range sits at 5.0x–6.5x. The lower end reflects margin risk; the upper end reflects scale, brand strength and lithium-ion product innovation.
Indicative enterprise value: £3.6m × 5.0x = £18m; £3.6m × 6.5x = £23.4m. Rounded range: £18m to £24m.
What buyers call exceptional
These bars are calibrated for UK SMEs and do not apply to midcap or larger businesses, where the thresholds are very different.
| Metric | Good | Exceptional | This business | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry growth | 5%+ CAGR | 10%+ CAGR | 5–8% (est.) | Good |
| Revenue scale | £10m+ | £20m+ | £39m | Exceptional |
| Revenue growth | 8%+ YoY | 15%+ YoY | 18% (FY2024) | Exceptional |
| EBITDA margin | 17.5%+ | 22.5%+ | 8.7% (est.) | Below |
| Gross margin | 50%+ | 75%+ | 25.5% | Below |
| Customer concentration (top 5) | <15% | <10% | Not disclosed | Unknown |
The metric that most limits the multiple today is the EBITDA margin, which compressed sharply in FY2024 and sits well below the "good" threshold for this sector.
Preparing for exit
| When | Action | Why a buyer cares | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3 months | Prepare monthly management accounts pack with bridge from statutory to normalised EBITDA | Demonstrates financial control and speeds due diligence | Multiple (↑) |
| 0–3 months | Quantify and strip out any exceptional FY2024 costs (new HQ fit-out, SLT recruitment) | Could lift normalised EBITDA toward £4m | EBITDA (↑) |
| 3–9 months | Formalise key customer terms into signed framework agreements | Reduces perceived revenue risk and lifts certainty | Multiple (↑) |
| 3–9 months | Document gross margin by product line and set pricing discipline to recover margin | Even 1 ppt improvement adds c.£400k EBITDA | EBITDA (↑) |
| 3–9 months | Embed the new Senior Leadership Team and reduce day-to-day owner involvement | Proves the business runs without the founders | Multiple (↑) |
| 9–12+ months | Grow the FireSealsDirect e-commerce channel to demonstrate repeat revenue stream | Recurring revenue commands a premium | Multiple (↑) |
| 9–12+ months | Integrate PJ Fire acquisition and prove cost synergies | Shows platform capability for buy-and-build | Multiple (↑) |
The single highest-return action is quantifying and stripping out exceptional costs from FY2024, because it directly lifts the EBITDA base on which the entire valuation rests.
Choosing your sale route
| Route | Fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Trade sale | Strong fit | At £39m revenue with own-brand manufacturing, Checkfire is a natural bolt-on for larger fire services groups seeking product margin and brand; expect competitive tension |
| Private equity | Strong fit | Scale and growth rate meet platform criteria; new SLT structure supports PE's preference for delegated management; roll-up runway in fragmented sector |
| Individual operator | Possible | Revenue scale and complexity may stretch a single buyer's capital and bandwidth; possible if backed by significant outside equity |
| Employee Ownership Trust | Unlikely | Founder family has already restructured into Multishield Group; EOT unlikely to deliver comparable value and harder to fund at this size |
Top route: A trade sale to a strategic acquirer, whether a UK competitor seeking brand and distribution, or an international fire equipment group looking for UK market access, is the strongest fit. At this scale, competition among buyers should be achievable, supporting price. For the owners, this route likely means a full exit within 12 months post-completion and absorption of the brand into the acquirer's portfolio, so it suits shareholders seeking clean liquidity rather than ongoing involvement.
What the process looks like
At your size expect a structured, competitive auction run by a larger corporate finance house, with full workstream due diligence and international buyers likely on the list. Allow around nine to fifteen months from starting properly to money in the bank.
| Phase | What happens | Typical duration |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation | Full vendor due diligence across financial, legal, tax and commercial, audited accounts, a management team ready to present, a professionally built data room | 3 to 4 months |
| Marketing | Controlled release of a teaser to a wide domestic and international buyer list, NDAs, information memorandum, process letter setting the timetable | 1 to 2 months |
| Offers and selection | Round one indicative offers, management presentations, site visits, round two binding offers, exclusivity granted late and briefly | 2 to 3 months |
| Due diligence | Financial, legal, tax, commercial, IT, insurance, environmental, ESG and pensions workstreams run simultaneously against a fixed timetable | 2 to 3 months |
| Legals | Share purchase agreement, disclosure, warranty and indemnity insurance, equity rollover and reinvestment documents, management incentive plan | 1 to 2 months |
| Completion and beyond | Signing, any regulatory or antitrust clearance, completion, then a defined transition period | Ongoing |
At this size, process discipline is the value driver. A well run timetable with several credible bidders reaching binding offers on the same day is what produces a premium.
What this is built from
- Companies House filings for 07990436.
- The company's public website (www.checkfire.co.uk), read for what the business actually does and who it sells to.
- Your own ratings on growth, stability, margin and capex, plus sector exit multiples for comparable UK businesses.
Next step
Exit your business to 1868 Capital
1868 Capital, led by Alec Dent, is actively looking to buy and run one strong UK business for the long term. If the profile fits, we can move quickly.

Why Alec started 1868 Capital
LinkedIn postAlec wrote this on why he is looking to buy and run one UK business for the long term.
Read on LinkedInWho is Alec?
Alec Dent leads 1868 Capital, which powers this Exit Estimator. He is looking to buy and personally run one high-quality UK business for the long term.
Before this he co-founded Weezy, grew it to hundreds of staff, sold it to Getir and ran global strategy there. You would be selling your business to an operator who has built, scaled and sold a company.
Is 1868 Capital the right fit?
I meet almost any owner thinking about exit, but this is the formal mandate:
- ✓Revenue of £5m to £60m, ideally with a recurring component and a stable track record
- ✓EBITDA of £1m to £10m with margins of 15% or more
- ✓Consistent growth of 10%+ a year over multiple years
- ✓A strong team in place, allowing a smooth leadership transition
- ✓England, Wales or Scotland, ideally near a major transport hub
- ✓Service-based model in a fragmented sector, mission critical to commercial clients
Other ways to sell
If the mandate does not fit, you may still have strong options:
Trade sale
A competitor or customer buys you. Often the highest headline price, but your business is absorbed and your legacy fades.
Private equity
Financial buyers back the team, then look to sell again in 3 to 5 years on fairly rigid market terms.
Employee Ownership Trust
Sell to your employees, usually with tax advantages and maximum continuity, though at a measured pace.